6 Comments

Why can't the Swiss start a new referedum on cancelling the order or better yet, cancelling the govt that sold out to the US?

Expand full comment

what happened to the concern that the plane was using parts from China.

Weren't there people in our Congress mentioned that as a real detriment to the US

buying the plane, or have I dreamed this

Expand full comment

There's a delicious irony here, Andrew. In "Augustine's Laws," a damn good satire of military contracting practices, Norman Augustine wrote about the powerful advantages of complex software to profit:

"Software is like entropy. It is difficult to grasp, weighs nothing, and obeys the second law of thermodynamics; i.e. it always increases."

Always increases, indeed! And so do profits (and control) for the F-35 and L/M. The F-35 is like every bad practice in "Augustine's Laws" coming true.

I thought it was a satire, Norm, not a user's manual! :-)

Expand full comment
Sep 24, 2022Liked by Andrew Cockburn

In spring 2020, officials banned the F-35A from flying within 25 nautical miles of lightning or thunderstorms after finding that a crucial system may not function correctly if hit by a bolt. At issue is the Onboard Inert Gas Generation System, or OBIGGS, which injects nitrogen-enriched air into the jet's fuel tanks.

Expand full comment
Sep 24, 2022·edited Sep 24, 2022

"Nice democracy you got there. Be a shame if your financial services, aka "money laundering" activities were to result in sanctions. And we wouldn't want it to get out how you hid Nazi loot, would we?"

Expand full comment